Re: Security question UNIX Sockets vs CIDR style access

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Chris Browne
Тема Re: Security question UNIX Sockets vs CIDR style access
Дата
Msg-id 87bpp7hpqr.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Security question UNIX Sockets vs CIDR style access  (Kevin Kempter <kevink@consistentstate.com>)
Список pgsql-admin
kevink@consistentstate.com (Kevin Kempter) writes:
> I'm looking for thoughts/feedback on the use of UNIX Sockets vs standard CIDR style access (i,e, Ident, MD5, etc) to
aPostgres Cluster. What are the 
> pros/cons, which is more secure and why, etc...

There is no single answer, which is essentially why there is the whole
array of access methods.

Each has reasons to be preferable under particular circumstances, and
there is a fair bit of documentation on this in the standard
documentation.

Please see:
   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/auth-methods.html
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="linuxdatabases.info" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];;
http://cbbrowne.com/info/sgml.html
"Over a hundred years ago, the German poet Heine
 warned the French not to underestimate the power of ideas:
 philosophical concepts nurtured in the stillness of a
 professor's study could destroy a civilization."
    --Isaiah Berlin in /The Power of Ideas/

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andy Shellam
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Security question UNIX Sockets vs CIDR style access
Следующее
От: Kenny W Drobnack
Дата:
Сообщение: rotating log files and adding timestamps to postgres logs