Re: UCT (Re: pgsql: Update time zone data files to tzdata release 2019a.)
От | Andrew Gierth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UCT (Re: pgsql: Update time zone data files to tzdata release 2019a.) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87blzdacpp.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | UCT (Re: pgsql: Update time zone data files to tzdata release 2019a.) (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: UCT (Re: pgsql: Update time zone data files to tzdata release 2019a.)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Christoph" == Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> writes: >> Etc/UCT is now a backward-compatibility link to Etc/UTC, instead of >> being a separate zone that generates the abbreviation "UCT", which >> nowadays is typically a typo. Postgres will still accept "UCT" as an >> input zone name, but it won't output it. Christoph> There is something wrong here. On Debian Buster/unstable, Christoph> using system tzdata (2019a-1), if /etc/timezone is Christoph> "Etc/UTC": Christoph> 11.3's initdb adds timezone = 'UCT' to postgresql.conf Christoph> 12beta1's initdb add timezone = 'Etc/UCT' to postgresql.conf Christoph> Is that expected behavior? It's clearly not what users expect and it's clearly the wrong thing to do, though it's the expected behavior of the current code: * On most systems, we rely on trying to match the observable behavior of * the C library's localtime() function. The database zone that matches * furthest into the past is the one to use. Often there will be several * zones with identical rankings (since the IANA database assigns multiple * names to many zones). We break ties arbitrarily by preferring shorter, * then alphabetically earlier zone names. I believe I pointed out a long, long time ago that this tie-breaking strategy was insane, and that the rule should be to prefer canonical names and use something else only in the case of a strictly better match. If TZ is set or if /etc/localtime is a symlink rather than a hardlink or copy of the zone file, then PG can get the zone name directly rather than having to do the comparisons, so the above comment doesn't apply; that gives you a workaround. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: