Re: [BUGS] Bug in create operator and/or initdb
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] Bug in create operator and/or initdb |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87acqpqtlt.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] Bug in create operator and/or initdb (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > steve=# select '224.0.0.0'::cidr; > cidr > ------------- > 224.0.0.0/4 > > which should be /32 according to what the docs say: 224-239 are multicast addresses. Making it /4 makes the entire multicast address space one network block which is about as reasonable an answer as anything else. > if (bits >= 8 && bits < ((dst - odst) * 8)) > ^^^^^^^^^ > bits = (dst - odst) * 8; > } > > I think the test for "bits >= 8" should be removed. Does anyone know > why it's there? I guess Vixie figured network blocks subdividing multicast address space weren't a sensible concept? It's a bit of a strange constraint to hard code into the C code though. Incidentally, how can that code possibly work? It treats odst as a pointer in some places but then calculates bits using arithmetic on it directly without dereferencing? -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: