Re: strange buildfarm failure on lionfish
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: strange buildfarm failure on lionfish |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87abtk2nar.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: strange buildfarm failure on lionfish (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: strange buildfarm failure on lionfish
Re: strange buildfarm failure on lionfish |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Someday we might like to allow this, but it seems to mean inventing a > new GUC context type, which I don't think I want to get into right now. Another option would be adding an option to initdb to override default config settings in the postgreql.conf. Then the pg_regress could just specify options like this for the regression database if necessary. It might make sense to tweak other settings in there as well to improve test coverage for things which probably don't happen in the short interval the regression test suite allows. Also, it might let us set up a standby database in the regression suite which would give us some xlog coverage as well which is a critical portion of the system the regression suite doesn't test at all. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: