Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8797.1251471136@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [PATCH] Largeobject access controls (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> writes: > The attached patch provides access control features on largeobject. > This patch adds the ownership and two permissions (SELECT and UPDATE) on > largeobjects. The two permissions controls reader and writer accesses to > the largeobejcts. What about DELETE permissions? Should we track that separately from UPDATE? > The CREATE USER/ROLE statement got a new option: LARGEOBJECT/NOLARGEOBJECT. > It enables to controls whether the user can create a largeobject, or not. I don't think this is necessary or appropriate. > The pg_largeobject system catalog is reworked to manage its metadata. > Actual data chunks are stored in the toast relation of pg_largeobject, This seems like a very confusing design, and one that (a) breaks existing code to no purpose, (b) will greatly complicate in-place upgrade. Instead of abusing a toast relation to do something nonstandard, keep pg_largeobject as it is now and add a new, separate catalog that carries ownership and permissions info for each LO OID. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: