Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8784.1120751495@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> The point here is that fsync-off is only realistic for development >> or playpen installations. You don't turn it off in a production >> machine, and I can't see that you'd turn off the full-page-write >> option either. So we have not solved anyone's performance problem. > Yes, this is basically another fsync-like option that isn't for > production usage in most cases. Sad but true. Just to make my position perfectly clear: I don't want to see this option shipped in 8.1. It's reasonable to have it in there for now as an aid to our performance investigations, but I don't see that it has any value for production. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: