Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8780.1350679721@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > This is a little sneaky, but I presume you only get the grammar > conflict if you try to sneak the "each" or "element" or "each element" > or whatever-you-call-it designator in BEFORE the column name. So what > about just putting it afterwards? Something like this: > FOREIGN KEY (a, b BY ELEMENT) REFERENCES ... That's not the syntax we're having problems with, it's the column constraint syntax; that is CREATE TABLE t1 (c int[] REFERENCES t2); It looks like we could support CREATE TABLE t1 (c int[] REFERENCES BY ELEMENT t2); but (1) this doesn't seem terribly intelligible to me, and (2) I don't see how we modify that if we want to provide at-least-one-match semantics later. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: