Re: CASE
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CASE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 877ka519e0.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CASE ("Victor Yegorov" <viy@pirmabanka.lv>) |
Ответы |
Re: CASE
Re: CASE |
Список | pgsql-sql |
"Victor Yegorov" <viy@pirmabanka.lv> writes: > ...COALESCE( MAX(e.edate),'2003-01-01')... > > MAX(e.edate): will return date type (just a guess) > '2003-01-01': will return char type (or varchar, doesn't matter). No, 'xyz' in postgres isn't necessarily a string constant, it's an untyped constant that the parser decides the type of based on context. In this case it gets decided based on the other return values of the coalesce/case. Notice the types chosen in this query: db=# explain select * from t where t_start = coalesce(now(),'2003-01-01') ; QUERY PLAN -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Seq Scanon t (cost=0.00..48223.40 rows=226 width=423) Filter: ((t_start)::timestamp with time zone = CASE WHEN (now() IS NOTNULL) THEN now() WHEN ('2003-01-01' IS NOT NULL) THEN '2003-01-01 00:00:00-05'::timestamp with time zone ELSE NULL::timestampwith time zone END) (2 rows) However, I suspect for some reason postgres is doing a string comparison in your case. I don't understand why. Note that now() isn't a date, it's a "timestamp with time zone", but I don't think that should be a problem. Try checking what types it uses in the plan for: EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM e WHERE (CASE WHEN coalesce(max(e.edate),'2003-01-01') >= now()::date THEN 'events' ELSE 'noevents' END ) = 'events'; Also, the standard date format should still sort correctly as alphanumeric, so I'm curious what you see when you do: SELECT now(); -- greg
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: