Re: cvs head? initdb?
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: cvs head? initdb? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 877k22kb49.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: cvs head? initdb? (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: cvs head? initdb?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck <JanWieck@yahoo.com> writes: > Robert Treat wrote: >> people would always want to have those choices (especially for doing >> development/testing/benchmarking between the different methods) the >> question is is it worth the effort to give people those options? To me, the question is whether it's worth the additional complexity for users and administrators, and to a lesser extent the code complexity. (I think the answer is "no") > And in the case of the cache strategy, the point is that different > access patterns might be served better by different strategies. Granted -- but IMHO it would be better to concentrate on making sure that ARC adapts to any access pattern so that the set of access patterns where you _really want_ LRU is a small as possible, if not empty. -Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: