Re: [WIP] Keeping track of snapshots
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [WIP] Keeping track of snapshots |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 877ifmzyit.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [WIP] Keeping track of snapshots (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [WIP] Keeping track of snapshots
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
"Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > The other question is about CommitTransactionCommand. Currently my > EOXact routine barfs for every snapshot not unregistered on main > transaction commit -- a leak. I see this as a good thing, however it > forced me to be more meticulous about not having ActiveSnapshot be set > in commands that have multiple transactions like VACUUM, multitable > CLUSTER and CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY. I believe ActiveSnapshot has to be set during CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY if it's an expression index which calls a function which needs a snapshot... AFAICT VACUUM had better not ever need a snapshot because its xmin isn't included in other vacuum commands' globalxmin so there's no guarantee that if it had a snapshot that the tuples visible in that snapshot wouldn't disappear out from under it. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: