Re: Merge Joins and Views
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Merge Joins and Views |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 877ifl61ut.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Merge Joins and Views (Chris Mayfield <cmayfiel@cs.purdue.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
"Chris Mayfield" <cmayfiel@cs.purdue.edu> writes: > You may already have this rough idea somewhere, but it seems to me that the > view could be flattened into the upper query as long as the join predicates > don't depend on coalesced columns. In the examples I sent, even if the > COALESCE is evaluated at the very end of the query, the merge join (on the id > columns) would still be correct. I don't remember the example but that's not true in general, consider something like select * from a left outer join ( select *, coalesce(b.x,'foo') from b ) as b using (a.y=b.y) The coalesce() doesn't depend on any join predicates, but if it's evaluated late it will be 'foo' for all the non-matching records instead of NULL. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: