Re: Finer Extension dependencies
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Finer Extension dependencies |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 877gy3kdkm.fsf@hi-media-techno.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Finer Extension dependencies (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Finer Extension dependencies
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> writes: > So my question is why you cannot depend on ip4r in that case. If some > version of the module introduces ipv6, then let's depend on that > version. It doesn't explain why a string feature name is needed. The only operator we have to compare version strings in PostgreSQL extensions is string equality. That's because we don't need more, and designing a version scheme policy would be far more work that any benefit I could imagine. And as we didn't enforce version naming policy in 9.1, it could be argued that it's too late, too. When you say 'require = ip6r' you are depending on *any* version of the extension that is providing it, whatever its version string. You don't have to know that '1.05' < '1.06' < '1.1' and you don't have to know that the first version with ipv6 support was called '1.06'. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: