Re: Connection pooling for differing databases?
От | Moreno Andreo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Connection pooling for differing databases? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 877c818f-1902-ebb7-e882-c7689627a08b@evolu-s.it обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Connection pooling for differing databases? (Arjun Ranade <ranade@nodalexchange.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Connection pooling for differing databases?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Il 07/03/2019 20:27, Arjun Ranade ha scritto: > Hi all, > > I'm wondering if there's a tool like pgpool that can provide a single > origin point (host/port) that will proxy/direct connections to the > specific servers that contain the db needing to be accessed. Yes, I think there are many, but I'm encouraging you to take a look at pgbouncer https://pgbouncer.github.io/ in pgbouncer.ini you enter database configuration values like database = host=hostname port=xyzk, like mydb1 = host=cluster1 port=6543 or mydb2 = host=cluster1 port=9876 mydb3 = host=cluster2 port=6543 but there many other parameters to refine your config (like "proxying" database names, so if you share names across clusters you can easily avoid conflicts) Pgbouncer should be installed on the same server as the databases or in another and listens on a different port than Postgres' (say 5431 while postgres is on 5432) I'm actively using in my environment with 2 clusters and about 500 databases, works flawlessly. One thing you have to consider, if under heavy workload (say 100's of connections) is to raise kernel value of maximum open files Cheers Moreno.-
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: