Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?
Дата
Msg-id 8764zb353a.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?  ("Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>)
Ответы Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?  (Steve Poe <spoe@sfnet.cc>)
Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
"Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com> writes:

> Alex wrote:
> > Without starting too much controvesy I hope, I would seriously
> > recommend you evaluate the AMCC Escalade 9500S SATA controller.
...
> At the risk of shaming myself with another 'me too' post, I'd like to
> say that my experiences back this up 100%.  The Escalade controllers are
> excellent and the Raptor drives are fast and reliable (so far).
...

I assume AMCC == 3ware now?

Has anyone verified that fsync is safe on these controllers? Ie, that they
aren't caching writes and "lying" about the write completing like IDE
drives often do by default?

--
greg

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Query Optimizer Failure / Possible Bug
Следующее
От: Steve Poe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?