Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8762vc1j1m.fsf@hi-media-techno.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: > I don't see the point of the sort-by-relpages code. The order the objects > are dumped should be irrelevant, as long as you obey the restrictions > dictated by dependencies. Or is it only needed for the multiple-target-dirs > feature? Frankly I don't see the point of that, so it would be good to cull > it out at least in this first stage. From the talk at CHAR(10), and provided memory serves, it's an optimisation so that you're doing largest file in a process and all the little file in other processes. In lots of case the total pg_dump duration is then reduced to about the time to dump the biggest files. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: