Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
От | Andrew Gierth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87619p568e.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes: Peter> You still pointlessly check memtupcount here: Peter> + if (memtupcount < 10000 || nss->input_count < 10000 || !nss->estimating)Peter> + return false; It's in a register; the test is free. Peter> This cast to void is unnecessary: Peter> + (void) ssup; It's an explicit statement that the parameter is otherwise unused. Maybe that compiler warning isn't usually on by default, but I personally regard it as good style to be explicit about it. Peter> Please try and at least consider my feedback. I don't expect youPeter> to do exactly what I ask, but I also don'texpect you toPeter> blithely ignore it. You should really stop digging this hole deeper. >> The INT64_MIN/MAX changes should be committed fairly soon. (I>> haven't posted a patch for TRACE_SORT) Peter> I wouldn't assume that. Oh ye of little faith. I would not have said that had I not already been informed of it by a committer, and indeed it is now committed. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: