Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
От | Andrew Gierth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87600sabb2.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes: Tom> There's also a question of whether we need to change anything in Tom> contrib/ so that it plays by whatever rules we set. There's an Tom> expectation that contrib modules should be buildable with PGXS, Tom> so they need to follow the rules. Andrew> ... that at least all of the *_plperl transform modules in Andrew> contrib/ fail to build with USE_PGXS already (i.e. for as long Andrew> as they have ever existed), because they rely on Andrew> plperl_helpers.h which is never installed anywhere, and trying Andrew> to get it via $(top_srcdir) obviously can't work in PGXS. Andrew> Haven't tried the python ones yet. And none of the plpython transforms can even parse their makefiles with USE_PGXS, let alone build, because they have an "include" directive pointing into src/pl/plpython. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: