Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-
От | Andrew Gierth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: v12 and pg_restore -f- |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 875zl11tla.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: v12 and pg_restore -f- (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: Tom> Perhaps we could change the back branches so that they interpret Tom> "-f -" as "write to stdout", but without enforcing that you use Tom> that syntax. We should definitely do that. Tom> Alternatively, we could revert the v12 behavior change. On the Tom> whole that might be the wiser course. I do not think the costs and Tom> benefits of this change were all that carefully thought through. Failing to specify -d is a _really fricking common_ mistake for inexperienced users, who may not realize that the fact that they're seeing a ton of SQL on their terminal is not the normal result. Seriously, this comes up on a regular basis on IRC (which is why I suggested initially that we should do something about it). -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: