AW: archiving question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Zwettler Markus (OIZ)
Тема AW: archiving question
Дата
Msg-id 8750e32c2f944480ae9dca5cf1fb2f06@zuerich.ch
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: archiving question  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: archiving question  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-general
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
> Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Dezember 2019 02:43
> An: Zwettler Markus (OIZ) <Markus.Zwettler@zuerich.ch>
> Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>; pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
> Betreff: Re: archiving question
>
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 03:04:55PM +0000, Zwettler Markus (OIZ) wrote:
> > What do you mean hear?
> >
> > Afaik, Postgres runs the archive_command per log, means log by log by log.
> >
> > How should we parallelize this?
>
> You can, in theory, skip the archiving for a couple of segments and then do the
> operation at once without the need to patch Postgres.
> --
> Michael


Sorry, I am still confused.

Do you mean I should move (mv * /backup_dir) the whole pg_xlog directory away and move it back (mv /backup_dir/*
/pg_xlog)in case of recovery? 

Markus








В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Shalini
Дата:
Сообщение: Tuple concurrency issue in large objects
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: archiving question