Re: Proposal: Snapshot cloning
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: Snapshot cloning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 874pqeaqdv.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Proposal: Snapshot cloning (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: Snapshot cloning
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Jan Wieck" <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes: > backend1: select publish_snapshot(); -- will block > > backend2: start transaction; > backend2: set transaction isolation level serializable; > backend2: select clone_snapshot(<pid>); -- will unblock backend1 It seems simpler to have a current_snapshot() function that returns an bytea or a new snapshot data type which set_current_snapshot(bytea) took to change your snapshot. Then you could use tables or out-of-band communication to pass around your snapshots however you please. set_current_snapshot() would have to sanity check that the xmin of the new snapshot isn't older than the current globaloldestxmin. That could be handy for debugging purposes too. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: