Re: latest hstore patch
От | Andrew Gierth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: latest hstore patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 874oqle47a.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: latest hstore patch (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: latest hstore patch
Re: latest hstore patch |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: David> * More name stuff: Why `hstore_to_list` rather thanDavid> `hstore_to_array`? And I'm not sure about `hstore_to_matrix`David>for the 2-dimensional array. I guess that's better thanDavid> `hstore_to_multidimensional_array`would be. ;-) >> I intentionally avoided hstore_to_array because it would be>> unclear which one it meant (the 1-d or 2-d result). Tom> hstore_to_list seems like a pretty horrible name though forTom> something that produces an array. I also note that"array"Tom> means "1-D array" according to no less an authority than the SQLTom> standard ;-). I think we could livewith hstore_to_array andTom> hstore_to_matrix. Thoughts, other ideas? I don't feel particularly strongly about the name (I've also intentionally held off on updating the pgfoundry version of the code until this is settled so no-one else should care either). My own expectation is that the operator should normally be used in preference (though obviously people's tastes will vary in this respect). -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: