Re: debug_sortsupport GUC?
От | Andrew Gierth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: debug_sortsupport GUC? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 874mpcbhom.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: debug_sortsupport GUC? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: debug_sortsupport GUC?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes: >> So if these debugging elogs are to be kept at all, I propose that>> rather than being compile-time options they shouldbe controlled by>> a debug_sortsupport GUC. Opinions? Peter> This seems like a reasonable idea. Why wouldn't it just be underPeter> the existing trace_sort GUC, though? That'sbeen enabled byPeter> default since 8.1. It's already defined in pg_config_manual.h. Ungh... yes, it's defined by default, but it clearly still requires keeping the #ifdefs in there in order to still build if someone manually undefines it. Was hoping to avoid the #ifdefs entirely - perhaps the existing #ifdefs should just be removed? If it's been enabled since 8.1 it seems unlikely to be causing anyone any issues. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: