Re: disaster recovery
От | Doug McNaught |
---|---|
Тема | Re: disaster recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 873cca7x42.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: disaster recovery (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: disaster recovery
Re: disaster recovery |
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Doug McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org> writes: >> Alex Satrapa <alex@lintelsys.com.au> writes: >>> 1) Under Linux, if you have the file system containing the WAL mounted >>> with asynchronous writes, "all bets are off". >> ... >> Even with ext2, WAL files are preallocated and PG calls fsync() after >> writing, so in practice it's not likely to cause problems. > > Um. I took the reference to "mounted with async write" to mean a > soft-mounted NFS filesystem. It does not matter which OS you think is > the one true OS --- running a database over NFS is the act of someone > with a death wish. But, yeah, soft-mounted NFS is a particularly > malevolent variety ... I took it as a garbled understanding of the "Linux does async metadata updates" criticism. Which is true for ext2, but was never the show-stopper some BSD-ers wanted it to be. :) -Doug
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: