Re: Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 873ap5akme.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
"Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > Greg, > >> What I was referring to by "passing" TPC-E was the criteria for a conformant >> benchmark run. TPC-C has iirc, only two relevant criteria: "95th percentile >> response time < 5s" and "average response time < 95th percentile response >> time". You can pass those even if 1 transaction in 20 takes 10-20s which is >> more than enough to cover checkpoints and other random sources of inconsistent >> performance. > > We can do this now. I'm unhappy because we're at about 1/4 of Oracle > performance, but we certainly pass -- even with 8.2. We certainly can pass TPC-C. I'm curious what you mean by 1/4 though? On similar hardware? Or the maximum we can scale to is 1/4 as large as Oracle? Can you point me to the actual benchmark runs you're referring to? But I just made an off-hand comment that I doubt 8.2 could pass TPC-E which has much more stringent requirements. It has requirements like: the throughput computed over any period of one hour, sliding over the Steady State by increments of ten minutes, varies from the Reported Throughput by no more than 2% -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: