Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 873agjly1j.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > Increasing the waiting time increases the failover time and thus > decreases the value of the standby as an HA system. Others value high > availability higher than you and so we had agreed to provide an option > to allow the max waiting time to be set. Sure, it's a nice option to have. But I think the default should be to pause WAL replay. The question I had was whether your solution for btree pointers marked dead and later dropped from the index works when the user hasn't configured a timeout and doesn't want standby queries killed. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: