Re: WITHIN GROUP patch
От | Andrew Gierth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WITHIN GROUP patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8738ldjimk.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WITHIN GROUP patch (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: WITHIN GROUP patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: Tom> I've committed this after significant editorialization --- mostTom> notably, I pushed control of the sort step intothe aggregateTom> support functions. Initial tests suggest that your version is ~40% slower than ours on some workloads. On my system, this query takes ~950ms using our dev branch of the code, and ~1050ms on git master (using \timing in psql for timings, and taking the best of many consecutive runs): select count(*) from (select percentile_disc(0.5) within group (order by i) from generate_series(1,3) i, generate_series(1,100000)j group by j) s; About ~700ms of that is overhead, as tested by running this query with enable_hashagg=false: select count(*) from (select j from generate_series(1,3) i, generate_series(1,100000) j group by j) s; So your version is taking 350ms for the percentile calculations compared to 250ms for ours. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: