Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 871xsg18j6.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Now, the disadvantages of large kernel cache, small PostgreSQL buffer > cache is that data has to be transfered to/from the kernel buffers, and > second, we can't control the kernel's cache replacement strategy, and > will probably not be able to in the near future, while we do control our > own buffer cache replacement strategy. The intent of the posix_fadvise() work is to at least provide a few hints about our I/O patterns to the kernel's buffer cache. Although only Linux supports it (right now), that should hopefully improve the status quo for a fairly significant portion of our user base. I'd be curious to see a comparison of the cost of transferring data from the kernel's buffers to the PG bufmgr. -Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: