Re: slow IN() clause for many cases
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: slow IN() clause for many cases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 871x0yirhs.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: slow IN() clause for many cases (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > IMHO the only way to do joins that access partitions is to do the > constraint exclusion at run time, but I can see thats a longer > conversation than I can start right now. My experience in Oracle was that you can see three different types of partition plans 1) Plans that the planner can statically deduce will access specific partitions. This is basically what Postgres has now. 2) Plans that the planner can statically deduce will only access a limited number of partitions but which partitions willbe determined at run-time. This is sort of like how Postgres handles index scans in subqueries where the value beinglooked up is a parameter. 3) Plans that expect to span all the partitions because it can't find any constraint in the query from which it can deducewhich partitions to look at. Option 2 happens both for joins, and also for simple lookups where the value being looked up is a parameter in a prepared query. My personal inclination is that prepared queries are the way of the future so I think this is an important case. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: