Re: more problems with count(*) on large table
От | Gregory Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: more problems with count(*) on large table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 871wciwtx0.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: more problems with count(*) on large table (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: more problems with count(*) on large table
|
Список | pgsql-general |
"Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > A. Kretschmer wrote: >> am Fri, dem 28.09.2007, um 11:56:46 -0400 mailte Mike Charnoky folgendes: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am still having problems performing a count(*) on a large table. This >> > >> > Now, certain count(*) queries are failing to complete for certain time >> > ranges (I killed the query after about 24 hours). The table is indexed >> > on a timestamp field. Here is one query that hangs: >> >> Again: an index can't help! Because of MVCC: 'select count(*)' without >> WHERE-condition forces an seq. table-scan. > > But he does have a WHERE condition. THe problem is, probably, that the > condition is not selective enough so the planner chooses to do a > seqscan. What does EXPLAIN SELECT ... say? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: