Re: Bug tracker tool we need
От | Alex |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug tracker tool we need |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 871unn7g4h.fsf@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug tracker tool we need (was: Last gasp) (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > One thing to note is that the referenced wiki page is over a year old. > And that many more things have been said on email lists than are > actually in that page. Yeah, I went through it briefly and rather important concern seem to have been raised by Tom Lane in this msg: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-05/msg01480.php This paragraph: > The real question is, who is going to keep it up to date? GSM has the > right point of view here: we need at least a couple of people who are > willing to invest substantial amounts of time, or it's not going to go > anywhere. Seeing that we can barely manage to keep the mailing list > moderator positions staffed, I'm not hopeful. > But as one note - I don't believe you can drive redmine completely > from email, which is certainly a requirement that has been discussed, > but is not entirely listed on that page. Ugh, what do you mean by that? You can change any attribute (like status, priority, assigned person, etc.) of a ticket via email. Anything else? > FWIW, I think the closest thing we've found so far would be debbugs - > which IIRC doesn't have any kind of reasonable database backend, which > would be a strange choice for a project like ours :) And makes many > things harder... What stops us from writing a postgres backend for debbugs if it is so brilliant on handing email and stuff? -- Alex
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: