Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Have dtrace depend on object files directly, not objfiles.txt
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Have dtrace depend on object files directly, not objfiles.txt |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8705.1444931504@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Have dtrace depend on object files directly, not objfiles.txt (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Curious that you didn't see something similar. Perhaps it depends on >> make version? But I spot-checked a couple of buildfarm critters and >> they both showed similar noise in the make step. > Yeah, I did to a parallel make just today, on a version that included > that patch, and it did not fail. I have: > [rhaas pgsql]$ make --version > GNU Make 3.81 > Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. > There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A > PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > This program built for i386-apple-darwin11.3.0 Interesting. I have $ make --version GNU Make 3.81 Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. This program built for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu so it's fundamentally the same gmake version. However, this being RHEL6, I don't doubt that Red Hat is carrying a bunch of back-ported patches from later versions. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: