Re: Postgres and data warehouses
От | Jerry Sievers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres and data warehouses |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 86twxuytje.fsf@jerry.enova.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgres and data warehouses (Nigel Gardiner <nigelgardiner@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Nigel Gardiner <nigelgardiner@gmail.com> writes: > I'm looking at making a data warehouse to address our rapidly spiralling report query times against the OLTP. I'm lookingfirst at what it would take to make this a > real-time data warehouse, as opposed to batch-driven. > > One approach I've seen used to achieve real time data warehousing is to have middleware that is intercepting all databasewrites and echoing them to a program that > rolls up the data warehouse values and updates the facts, dimensions and so on on the fly. Another approach was to usetriggers on the tables of interest to write to > tables to journal the changes, which then get processed by a batch job to achieve the same thing. > > One of the problems of the trigger on the transactional database > approach is that if there is ever a problem with the trigger, the main > transaction is affected. I'm not sure if that is avoidable with proper > exception handling in the trigger code? It does mean a lot of trigger > code to maintain, and another schema to maintain (the journalled > changes), so there were several drawbacks. Firing a trigger on INS, UPD, DEL that simply loads a a journal table with PK value and the event type is so utterly trivial as to be a non-issue anywhere but the most high impact environments. > I've had a quick search and haven't seen this approach used yet, but I was thinking, the asynchronous replication of Postgresdatabases could be used as a streaming > journal of changes to be processed by a data warehouse. The other approach that suggests itself is WAL file shipping. I'venot dug into the async rep protocol yet, > before I do so I just wanted to get some brief feedback on whether I'm on the wrong track or not, and if there's some betterapproach I should be looking at first > instead. Consider if new Logical Change Set features of 9.4 might apply to your case. May accomplish same as trigger based solution without all the extra supporting structures hitherto necessary. > Any feedback much appreciated. > > Regards, > Nigel > -- Jerry Sievers Postgres DBA/Development Consulting e: postgres.consulting@comcast.net p: 312.241.7800
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: