Re: [HACKERS] Did the inet type get backed out?
От | Tom Ivar Helbekkmo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Did the inet type get backed out? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 86ems9do1k.fsf@athene.nhh.no обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Did the inet type get backed out? (darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Did the inet type get backed out?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) writes: > But it worked before. In fact it still works on another system with > an earlier compile. "Works" for me, using a cvs update from yesterday morning (the morning after the BETA 2 freeze), modulo the fact that someone committed changes to #ifdef out ("#ifdef BAD") all the calls to the actual inet parser routines, effectively causing all data to be rejected. Since we had an implementation that actually worked, and the changes that we wanted to make were compatible with currently stored data, it would have been smarter to leave it working until the changes were ready to be committed. It's better to be able to keep testing something that doesn't have all the wanted functionality than to disable it until an unknown time in the future! :-) -tih -- Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity. --Niles Crane, "Frasier"
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: