Re: pg_dumpall with flag --no-role-passwords omits roles comments as well
От | Daniel Gustafsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dumpall with flag --no-role-passwords omits roles comments as well |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 86FC9F16-E6AA-4C04-B0FB-024662CA8D2A@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_dumpall with flag --no-role-passwords omits roles comments as well (Bartosz Chroł <bartosz.chrol@handen.pl>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dumpall with flag --no-role-passwords omits roles comments as well
Re: pg_dumpall with flag --no-role-passwords omits roles comments as well |
Список | pgsql-general |
> On 20 Mar 2024, at 18:40, Bartosz Chroł <bartosz.chrol@handen.pl> wrote: > > Hello, > I've tried to dump roles using the following call to pg_dumpall: > pg_dumpall.exe --roles-only --no-role-passwords > However I noticed that comments on roles are also omitted from the dump, as if --no--comments flag was set - but it wasn't. > When I call `pg_dumpall.exe --roles-only` than it works as expected - both passwords and comments are dumped. > > Is it correct behaviour? It doesn't look like to me, but maybe I'm missing something. I've checked PostgreSQL 16.2 (onWindows 11 and Ubuntu 20) and 14.0 (on Windows Server 2019), same everywhere. Comments on roles are stored against the pg_authid catalog relation which is the catalog used for dumping roles, but when using --no-role-passwords we instead switch to using the pg_roles catalog relation. Since comments are dumped for the relations which are dumped, this means that the comments on roles are omitted when --no-role-passwords is used. It's not clear whether that was intentional or not, I'm failing to find the thread where it was discussed on a quick mailing list search. It kind of feels like an accidental bug since the restored role will be in pg_authid where the comment should be attached. -- Daniel Gustafsson
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: