Re: pgFoundry Download URLs
От | David E. Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 86B9D86C-16E7-4E1B-B51D-ED432F25A4C8@justatheory.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgFoundry Download URLs
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Jan 4, 2010, at 12:06 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > and makes it harder to aggregate them back into a canonical search/aggregator which is what some people want... How so? It's not hard to aggregate stuff, and we're not doing it *at all* right now. > I hope you are not advocating we should put those lists on @postgresql.org again which is almost the opposite of what youproposed with "hosting stuff elsewhere. Also a fair number of the above mentioned resources don't actually provide mailinglists. Any subdomain would do. >> 2) a place for web pages/documentation for some projects (which could be >> a wiki, or something else) > > hmm? again this sounds like a central wiki (which we have) or are you asking for every project running their own wiki? The latter. Which most other project hosting sites already offer. > again the news feed stuff is mostly a tool issue (newer fusionforge versions do actually have way better RSS feed capabilities).However what we probably want is a thin aggregation layer on top of those (maybe a version of planet.postgresql.orgon steriods with aggregates the various feeds and adds search on top). Yes. > imho that one is not at all related to pgfoundry or the problem at hand. Well, it's certainly related to download URLs. But it's not at all what pgFoundry does, I agree. > so what place would you redirect people too if they ask for a listing of stuff related to postgresql? and no I don't thinka manually maintained "software catalogue" like we have on the website is any/much better. Agreed. Best, David
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: