Re: Index bloat problem?
От | David Roussel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index bloat problem? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 869771629a1d24a91b8df779f7cddfe9@diroussel.xsmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Index bloat problem? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index bloat problem?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 22 Apr 2005, at 06:57, Tom Lane wrote: > Bill Chandler <billybobc1210@yahoo.com> writes: >> Client is reporting that the size of an index is >> greater than the number of rows in the table (1.9 >> million vs. 1.5 million). > > This thread seems to have wandered away without asking the critical > question "what did you mean by that?" > > It's not possible for an index to have more rows than there are in > the table unless something is seriously broken. And there aren't > any SQL operations that let you inspect an index directly anyway. > So: what is the actual observation that led you to the above > conclusion? Facts, please, not inferences. I work for the client in question. Glad you picked up on that point. I covered the detail in my my post "How can an index be larger than a table" on 21 Apr. 2005. I guess I was too detailed, and too much info put people off. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-04/msg00553.php quoting from there... | |SELECT relname, relkind, reltuples, relpages FROM pg_class WHERE relname LIKE 'dave_data%'; | |relname relkind reltuples relpages |======================================= ======= ========= ======== |dave_data_update_events r 1593600.0 40209 |dave_data_update_events_event_id_key i 1912320.0 29271 |dave_data_update_events_event_id_seq S 1.0 1 |dave_data_update_events_lds_idx i 1593600.0 6139 |dave_data_update_events_obj_id_idx i 1593600.0 6139 |iso_pjm_data_update_events_obj_id_idx i 1593600.0 6139 | Note that there are only 1593600 rows in the table, so why the 1912320 figure? Of course I checked that the row count was correct... | |EXPLAIN ANALYZE |select count(*) from iso_pjm_data_update_events | |QUERY PLAN |Aggregate (cost=60129.00..60129.00 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=35933.292..35933.293 rows=1 loops=1) | -> Seq Scan on iso_pjm_data_update_events (cost=0.00..56145.00 rows=1593600 width=0) (actual time=0.213..27919.497 rows=1593600 loops=1) |Total runtime: 35933.489 ms | and... | |select count(*) from iso_pjm_data_update_events | |count |1593600 | so it's not that there are any undeleted rows lying around
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: