Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8696.1179147054@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?
Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji? Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > Uh ... so the lock-file stuff is completely broken on Windows? Not so much broken as commented out ... on looking at the code, it's blindingly obvious that we don't even try to create a socket lock file if not HAVE_UNIX_SOCKETS. Sigh. There is a related risk even on Unix machines: two postmasters can be started on the same port number if they have different settings of unix_socket_directory, and then it's indeterminate which one you will contact if you connect to the TCP port. I seem to recall that we discussed this several years ago, and didn't really find a satisfactory way of interlocking the TCP port per se. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: