Re: A 2 phase commit weirdness
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: A 2 phase commit weirdness |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8696.1117519796@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: A 2 phase commit weirdness (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@surnet.cl>) |
| Ответы |
Re: A 2 phase commit weirdness
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@surnet.cl> writes:
> But at awakening, the user will get this:
> ERROR: relation 66002 deleted while still in use
> This is ugly -- I don't think there is a way to get out of it.
There had better be a way, since (I suppose) the ERROR is preventing the
commit from succeeding ...
> Unrelated question: is it intended that the prepared transactions are
> visible cross-database through pg_prepared_xacts?
That is a good question. Can a backend running in a different database
execute the COMMIT (or ROLLBACK)? Offhand I'd bet that will not work,
which suggests we'd better make the view per-database. [ thinks a bit
more... ] We might be able to make it work, but there seems like a lot
of potential for bugs/fragility there. Might be best to take the narrow
definition to start with.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: