Re: Is the Halloween problem an issue in Postgres
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is the Halloween problem an issue in Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 869172f6-9114-e759-79ba-eb17f1c5082c@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is the Halloween problem an issue in Postgres (Thomas Kellerer <shammat@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is the Halloween problem an issue in Postgres
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 12/2/20 2:02 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote: > guyren@icloud.com schrieb am 02.12.2020 um 21:27: >> The Halloween problem is that it is a challenge for the database if >> you’re updating a field that is also in the WHERE clause of the same >> query. >> >> I just saw a presentation from someone about how in SQL Server he >> recommended writing changes to a temp table and then writing them to >> the table as being much more efficient. > > It sounds strange to me, that this _is_ actually a problem. > > Why exactly is that a problem in SQL Server? Yeah that was a new one to me. A quick search found: https://www.sqlshack.com/the-halloween-problem-in-sql-server-and-suggested-solutions/ > And what are the consequences if you do it nevertheless. > > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: