Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8690.1103904211@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't! (Gary Doades <gpd@gpdnet.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
|
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Gary Doades <gpd@gpdnet.co.uk> writes: > AFAIK Win32 does not care where in private process address space the > "shared memory" segment is. It can be mapped to different addresses in > different processes and still share the same physical address space. > This is why Win32 puts the private shared address anywhere in its own > address space, because it doesn't matter. Win32 may not care, but we do. The shared memory segment must be mapped at the same address in every backend. > If you try to force it to any particular private process address you may > fail as you don't always know where program code (DLLs etc.) may be loaded. This is (or ought to be) irrelevant, because we are only talking about instances of a single executable. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: