Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 04:50:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> A look at set_arg() suggests that the spelling of that option is really
>> "sess-key" ... Marko, is that correct?
> Yes.
Will fix.
>> I also notice that there are a bunch of undocumented options with
>> names beginning "expect-". Should those be documented, and if so
>> could we get some text for that?
> They are mainly meant for regtests, to see if final message structure
> is what is expected. I don't see much value for users.
OK, thanks for checking. I see we're not documenting the "debug"
option either, so this seems sensible, though perhaps a comment in
the code is warranted.
regards, tom lane