Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8682.1240426138@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> That only works for make check, not make installcheck. > Configuration affects what can be tested in installcheck, that's quite > natural. I would be happy with simply adding an alternative expected > output file for min_prepared_xacts=0 case. Like we've done for xml test > cases, for example, though that's a compile-time option. Hmm, that's true; the xml case is a relevant precedent. This would be a pretty low-effort way of addressing the problem. Another nice thing about it is that we'd stop having a default max_prepared_transactions value that's completely useless (5 is guaranteed to be either too much or not enough...) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: