"Ehrenreich, Sigrid" <Ehrenreich@consist.de> writes:
> I am not sure, if this is a bug. I think at least it is a documentation bug.
The char(n) datatype has some odd rules: generally, trailing blanks are
considered insignificant, which is why you're getting 0 for the length.
Trailing blanks will also get stripped whenever the value is converted
to varchar or text, which is what's happening in your || example.
On the other hand, concat() doesn't execute any SQL type conversions;
it just concatenates the I/O representations of the values, so that
the trailing blanks survive.
Yes, all of these things are documented somewhere. The implications
aren't always obvious of course.
Almost always, the correct response to questions like this is "don't
use char(n)". The preferred string type in Postgres is text, or if
you have a reason to have a specific character-length limit (pro tip:
you probably don't), then use varchar(n). In any case, if you think
trailing blanks are valid data, char(n) is not what to store them in.
regards, tom lane