Re: Another issue with invalid XML values
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Another issue with invalid XML values |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8657.1311688354@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Another issue with invalid XML values (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Another issue with invalid XML values
Re: Another issue with invalid XML values |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> writes: > What's more, xml.c actually does attempt to protect against this situation > by calling LIBXML_TEST_VERSION in pg_xml_init_library(). > But that check doesn't fire in our case, because it explicitly allows the > actual library version to be newer than the header file version, as long > as the major versions agree (the major version being "2" in this case). > So in essence, libxml promises ABI backwards-compatibility, but breaks > that promise when it comes to restoring the structured error context. Fun. > The only fix I can come up with is to explicitly test whether or not we're > able to restore the structured error context in pg_xml_init_library(). Yeah, I think you are right. > The downside of this is that a libxml version upgrade might break postgres, Such an upgrade would break Postgres anyway --- better we are able to detect and report it clearly than that we fail in bizarre ways. >> As a side note, we don't add an rpath for libxml2 like we do for Perl and >> Python. > Sounds like we should change that. I don't think so. It would just be another headache for packagers --- in Red Hat distros, at least, packages are explicitly forbidden from containing any rpath settings. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: