Re: get_progname and .exe suffix
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: get_progname and .exe suffix |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8650.1097945846@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: get_progname and .exe suffix (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: get_progname and .exe suffix
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> What would break if we caused get_progname itself to strip the suffix?
> Yes. get_progname() actually just returns a pointer to one past the last
> directory separator it finds in its argument string. Having it strip the
> .exe directly would in effect involve mangling argv[0]. That's what
> makes me slightly nervous about it. We could have it strdup() the result
> and then mangle that - note that it is called by postmaster before we
> set up any memory context stuff.
Seems reasonable. What I was more worried about though was whether
there are any callers that actually need a non-stripped result.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: