Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 865.1330529584@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com> writes: > How about removing postgresql_fdw_validator from backend binary, and > changing dblink to use contrib/postgresql_fdw's validator? It breaks > some backward compatibility and requires contrib/postgresql_fdw to be > installed before using contrib/dblink with foreign servers, but ISTM > that it doesn't become so serious. I don't think that creating such a dependency is acceptable. Even if we didn't mind the dependency, you said yourself that contrib/postgresql_fdw's validator will accept stuff that's not appropriate for dblink. If we don't think postgresql_fdw_validator belongs in core after all, we should just move it to dblink. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: