Re[2]: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE
От | Sferacarta Software |
---|---|
Тема | Re[2]: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8640.981214@bo.nettuno.it обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Bruce, domenica, 13 dicembre 98, you wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Seems that I found a bug on HAVING clause, see attached file. >> >> -Jose'- BM> Can you summarize what was the result of your several bug reports on IN BM> and HAVING. Is there a problem that needs to be added to the TODO list? Well, I tried IN-ANY-ALL on a subselect containing an HAVING clause like: select * from emp where ename in ( select ename from emp group by ename having 1 < count(ename) ); and I was thought that IN-ANY-ALL were buggy, then I tried this: select * from emp where ename IN ( select ename from emp where deptno=20); and now I know the bug is only in the HAVING clause. -Jose'-
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: