Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Herbie McDuck wrote:
>> On the BOOLEAN issue, it seems that a majority of the 'MAJOR', high dollar
>> DBs. do not support the boolean datatype.
>>
>> Is PG supporting a depreciated feature or have the other DBs yet to catch
>> up?
> We aren't sure. :-)
Sure we are. SQL99 defines type boolean, SQL92 didn't. AFAICT our
boolean type is exactly compatible with SQL99 (except that SQL99 offers
UNKNOWN as an alternate spelling of NULL::BOOLEAN, which we haven't
bothered to provide yet).
I wasn't actually planning to respond to such an obvious troll ...
regards, tom lane