Re: Postgres-XL
От | SQL Padawan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres-XL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 85RGbgzOr-M5AWyHpnx6XqpZa5MELRdlfvtDO2VQ648MvsE0NPJ8UGtMKwBmOQ5OdnRa391MYlrmTkEmWIkvY-jY7qDdGsh2FPzI781YE1Y=@protonmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres-XL (Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Saturday, November 27th, 2021 at 17:12, Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> wrote: > Στις 27/11/21 7:01 μ.μ., ο/η SQL Padawan έγραψε: > > > Postgres-XL is not exactly a replication solution but it is ACID compliant and it doesn't have problem with sequences.It is a decent high availability solution. More information is available here: https://www.postgres-xl.org/ > > > > > > It hasn't moved in almost 3 years? A Marie-Céleste project? > You know that "free" in software is one thing and "free" beer another. Yes of course - and I'm not criticising or pointing fingers at anyone involved in that project. It's just that it has been **my experience** that software always has issues - esp. a piece of distributed software whosefoundation is also v. complex. PostgreSQL 10 is at version 19 - the XL project hasn't moved since 10.1 - doesn't inspire confidence in me anyway - and Ipersonally would be very hesitant about recommending what is, AFAICS, abandon-ware. YMMV - with all respect, SQLP!
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: