Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8588.1210177204@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists ("Matthew T. O'connor" <matthew@zeut.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Matthew T. O'connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes: > Patches are an integral part of the conversation about development, I > think trying to split them up is awkward at best. Do people really > still think that the potential for larger messages is really a problem? Personally I'd be fine with abandoning -patches and just using -hackers. We could try it for awhile, anyway, and go back if it seems worse. > By the way, what is the actual size limit on hackers vs patches. They do have different size limits; we'd have to raise the limit on -hackers if we do this. Marc would know exactly what the limits are. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: